Showing posts with label United States. Show all posts
Showing posts with label United States. Show all posts

Friday, April 1, 2011

US cleric claims Islamists are elated by revolts

Imam Anwar al-Awlaki in Yemen October 2008, ta...Image via Wikipedia

U.S Cleric says; Islamists are elated by revolts,



WASHINGTON U.S.A, So called cleric Anwar al-Awlaki, the Yemeni-“American” cleric who is a top propagandist for Al Qaeda, broke his silence on the uprisings in the Arab world, claiming that Islamist extremists had gleefully watched the success of protest movements against governments they had long despised (London Times, One dictatorship for another repression out-dated extreme Muslim one? is it better the devil you know? than you don’t no?)

“The mujahedeen around the world are going through a moment of elation,” Awlaki wrote in a new issue of the “English-language” Qaeda magazine Inspire, “and I wonder whether the West is aware of the upsurge of mujahedeen activity in Egypt, Tunisia, Libya, Yemen, Arabia, Algeria and Morocco?”

Sir Michael Black-Feather the English first minister said; Awlaki’s four-page essay, titled “The Tsunami of Change,” is among a handful of statements by Al Qaeda’s leaders countering the common view among Western analysts that the terrorist network looks irrelevant at a time of change unprecedented in the modern Middle East. In ousting the rulers of Tunisia and Egypt and threatening other Arab leaders, a core of secular-leaning, demonstrators have called for democracy and generally avoided violence, and are all at odds with Al Qaeda’s creed as it tries to install rigid Islamist rule across the world which just won’t ever happen, a few nut-cases poking sticks in wasp’s nest’s won’t change this world, the AL Qaeda creed live in the dark ages in a time that won’t ever be seen again, and is only seen by those delusional to see it within their own minds, and impose their derision’s (Dictatorship) on others .

In an audio statement this month, the Egyptian deputy to Osama bin Laden, Ayman al-Zawahri, pleaded with the Egyptians who toppled President Hosni Mubarak to shun the United States, reject democracy and embrace Islam as the answer to their problems. Arguing that Al Qaeda deserved some indirect credit for the uprisings, he said the United States’ willingness to drop its support for Mr. Mubarak and other authoritarian leaders was a “direct result” of the Sept. 11 attacks.

Mr. Awlaki’s essay is more colloquial and confident, asserting that the momentous change in Arab countries left Western leaders “confused, worried, and unhappy for the departure of some of its closest and most reliable friends.”

He quotes American commentators who describe the uprisings as a refutation of Al Qaeda, including Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton’s assertion last month that “the success of peaceful protests has discredited the extremists.”

Mr. Awlaki, who is thought to be hiding in Yemen, argues that such conclusions are premature. “The outcome doesn’t have to be an Islamic government for us to consider what is occurring to be a step in the right direction,” he writes.

By “breaking the barriers of fear” and toppling leaders who protected “American imperial interests,” he asserts, the uprisings should play to the long-term advantage of Al Qaeda’s philosophy. He points to Yemen and Libya, where embattled leaders are clinging to power, as places where turmoil could open possibilities for jihadists to organize.

Awlaki’s statement comes as some American officials have expressed anxiety about just that possibility. In Libya, an American military official said this week that there were “flickers” of intelligence suggesting that Qaeda or Hezbollah operatives were among the rebels fighting Col. Muammar el-Qaddafi. And in Yemen, President Ali Abdullah Saleh’s weakening grip on power could take pressure off Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula.

Expressing hope that revolution will spread from Yemen to Saudi Arabia, Mr. Awlaki asks, “Doesn’t the West realize how the jihadi work would just take off as soon as the regimes of the Gulf start crumbling?”

Sir Michael” said the likes of Qaeda propagandists are “consummate opportunists no matter what happens, these half-wits will try to spin it to their benefit.” But he said several influential Qaeda theorists appear to believe that the departure of authoritarian leaders will prove advantageous.
“Al Qaeda recognizes how marginal they are on this,” Sir Michael said. “But it could open the kind of operating space they’ve wanted for a long time when people lose hope and leeches like Qaeda move in and offer hope which is not as it seems because people are lost the grab at it, only when it sinks in dose one realise it’s not what one really wanted, but the infection is already there and needs the skills of a good surgeon to remove it not a tank driver?.”

Inspire magazine, five issues of which have been posted on militant Web sites, is believed to be the work primarily of Samir Khan, a Saudi-born American who grew up in Queens and North Carolina before moving to Yemen in 2009.

It is a slick, graphics-heavy, irreverent publication aimed at young Muslims attracted to the extremist cause; the latest issue includes an invitation to readers to e-mail questions to Awlaki and a two-page primer on how to use an AK automatic rifle.

Khan himself contributed to inspire an appeal to Egyptians not to stop after overthrowing Mr. Mubarak but to impose religious rule.
“The question now comes: what do you do if your government decides not to rule by Shariah?” he asks, referring to Islamic law. “Who does your loyalty go to? The state or Allah?

Sir Michael said; God/Allah gave all of mankind free will, which all these extremist Muslims seem to have forgotten, or just don’t understand the true worlds of God, having their minds infected by false so called clerics.
God does not inflict his rules/laws on to any man, because you all have free will, either to follow his words or not to follow them, “But it’s not up to any of mankind to thrust Gods/Allah words on to any men in his name, only God himself has this right? Extremist in their own rule of law, which are not Gods laws, are truly blasphemous and their laws are full of blasphemy and hate.

Acknowledgements: London Times

Enhanced by Zemanta

Tuesday, February 22, 2011

Whose hue in the car world...



Whose hue in the car world...



By Peter Petterson

First published atQondio:



Whose hue in the car world?

The British Royal Automobile Club came up with a list of what a car's color says about the owner. Here is what your vehicle could be telling you.

Black: You're ambitious and status seeking

Green: You're very traditional and an elitist

Blue: You're a team player and very sociable

White: You're aloof dutiful and methodical

Grey: You're understated and cautious

Silver: You have a sense of style, but you can be pompous

Red: You're outgoing, impulsive and easily bored.


Acknowledgements: Chicago Sun-Times



http://huttriver.qondio.com

Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday, February 16, 2011

Weapons of mass imagination...

Republic of Iraq Former President Saddam Husse...Image via Wikipedia
The British newspaper, The Guardian reported recently that an Iraqi defector made up the claims that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction to help topple his dictatorial government.

The defector, allegedly Rafid Ahmed Alwan al-Janabi, said in an interview with The Guardian that he fabricated claims of mobile biological weapons and clandestine factories made to German intelligence officials throughout 2000.

Former US president, George W Bush and senior US officials cited the threat posed by Iraqi biological weapons as justification for the US-led invasion in 2003.

The world now knows no weapons of mass destruction were ever found, and as a consequence of what are now revealed as pathetic lies, years of political and sectarian bloodletting followed in Iraq, resulting in more than 100,000 deaths, mostly civilians
.
"Maybe I was right, maybe I wasn't right," Janabi, codenamed "Curveball" by American and German  intelligence  officials and identified as a chemical engineer, told the newspaper.

"I had a problem with the Saddam regime," he said."I wanted to get rid of him and now I had this chance."
History and the world will never shed any tears for the monsterous Saddam Hussein and his rotten regime, but they will  undoubtably question whether Mr Janabi's actions justified the means.

The information supplied by Janabi formed the basis of a 2003 speech by secretary of state , Colin Powell, before the United Nations Security Council.

"They gave me this chance to fabricate something to topple the regime," Janabi said.

"Believe me, there was no other way to bring about freedom in Iraq. There were no other possibilities."
Saddam Hussein and his despicable regime has gone, and he and many of his fellow perpetrators of evil have been executed or imprisoned, but it would be a stretch of the imagination to say  Iraq and its people are free.
Iraq is on the cusp of civil war, and the coalition of the willing has all but withdrawn from Iraq.

Acknowledgements: Reuters,  Peter Petterson

Enhanced by Zemanta

Monday, February 14, 2011

Cuba's cure: Why is Cuba exporting its health care miracle to the world's poor?


Cuba's Cure:


Why is Cuba exporting its health care miracle to the world's poor?







Cuba's health care system is based on the neighborhood doctor and nurse. Most often, one of them lives upstairs from the office.
Photo by Sarah van Gelder

Cubans say they offer health care to the world's poor because they have big hearts. But what do they get in return?

They live longer than almost anyone in Latin America. Far fewer babies die. Almost everyone has been vaccinated, and such scourges of the poor as parasites, TB, malaria, even HIV/AIDS are rare or non-existent. Anyone can see a doctor, at low cost, right in the neighborhood.

The Cuban health care system is producing a population that is as healthy as those of the world's wealthiest countries at a fraction of the cost. And now Cuba has begun exporting its system to under-served communities around the world—including the United States.

The story of Cuba's health care ambitions is largely hidden from the people of the United States, where politics left over from the Cold War maintain an embargo on information and understanding. But it is increasingly well-known in the poorest communities of Latin America, the Caribbean, and parts of Africa where Cuban and Cuban-trained doctors are practicing.

In the words of Dr. Paul Farmer, Cuba is showing that “you can introduce the notion of a right to health care and wipe out the diseases of poverty.”

Health Care for All Cubans
Many elements of the health care system Cuba is exporting around the world are common-sense practices. Everyone has access to doctors, nurses, specialists, and medications. There is a doctor and nurse team in every neighborhood, although somewhat fewer now, with 29,000 medical professionals serving out of the country—a fact that is causing some complaints. If someone doesn't like their neighborhood doctor, they can choose another one.

House calls are routine, in part because it's the responsibility of the doctor and nurse team to understand you and your health issues in the context of your family, home, and neighborhood. This is key to the system. By catching diseases and health hazards before they get big, the Cuban medical system can spend a little on prevention rather than a lot later on to cure diseases, stop outbreaks, or cope with long-term disabilities. When a health hazard like dengue fever or malaria is identified, there is a coordinated nationwide effort to eradicate it. Cubans no longer suffer from diphtheria, rubella, polio, or measles and they have the lowest AIDS rate in the Americas, and the highest rate of treatment and control of hypertension.

For health issues beyond the capacity of the neighborhood doctor, polyclinics provide specialists, outpatient operations, physical therapy, rehabilitation, and labs. Those who need inpatient treatment can go to hospitals; at the end of their stay, their neighborhood medical team helps make the transition home. Doctors at all levels are trained to administer acupuncture, herbal cures, or other complementary practices that Cuban labs have found effective. And Cuban researchers develop their own vaccinations and treatments when medications aren't available due to the blockade, or when they don't exist.

Exporting Health Care
For decades, Cuba has sent doctors abroad and trained international students at its medical schools. But things ramped up beginning in 1998 when Hurricanes George and Mitch hammered Central America and the Caribbean. As they had often done, Cuban doctors rushed to the disaster zone to help those suffering the aftermath. But when it was time to go home, it was clear to the Cuban teams that the medical needs extended far beyond emergency care. So Cuba made a commitment to post doctors in several of these countries and to train local people in medicine so they could pick up where the Cuban doctors left off. ELAM, the Havana-based Latin American School of Medicine, was born, and with it the offer of 10,000 scholarships for free medical training.

Today the program has grown to 22,000 students from Latin America, the Caribbean, Africa, Asia, and the United States who attend ELAM and 28 other medical schools across Cuba. The students represent dozens of ethnic groups, 51 percent are women, and they come from more than 30 countries. What they have in common is that they would otherwise be unable to get a medical education. When a slum dweller in Port au Prince, a young indigenous person from Bolivia, the son or daughter of a farmer in Honduras, or a street vendor in the Gambia wants to become a doctor, they turn to Cuba. In some cases, Venezuela pays the bill. But most of the time, Cuba covers tuition, living expenses, books, and medical care. In return, the students agree that, upon completion of their studies, they will return to their own under-served communities to practice medicine.

The curriculum at ELAM begins, for most students, with up to a year of “bridging” courses, allowing them to catch up on basic math, science, and Spanish skills. The students are treated for the ailments many bring with them.

At the end of their training, which can take up to eight years, most students return home for residencies. Although they all make a verbal commitment to serve the poor, a few students quietly admit that they don't see this as a permanent commitment.

One challenge of the Cuban approach is making sure their investment in medical education benefits those who need it most. Doctors from poor areas routinely move to wealthier areas or out of the country altogether. Cuba trains doctors in an ethic of serving the poor. They learn to see medical care as a right, not as a commodity, and to see their own role as one of service. Stories of Cuban doctors who practice abroad suggest these lessons stick. They are known for taking money out of their own pockets to buy medicine for patients who can't afford to fill a prescription, and for touching and even embracing patients.

Cuba plans with the help of Venezuela to take their medical training to a massive scale and graduate 100,000 doctors over the next 15 years, according to Dr. Juan Ceballos, advisor to the vice minister of public health. To do so, Cuba has been building new medical schools around the country and abroad, at a rapid clip.

But the scale of the effort required to address current and projected needs for doctors requires breaking out of the box. The new approach is medical schools without walls. Students meet their teachers in clinics and hospitals, in Cuba and abroad, practicing alongside their mentors. Videotaped lectures and training software mean students can study anywhere there are Cuban doctors. The lower training costs make possible a scale of medical education that could end the scarcity of doctors.



Narciso Ortiz, U.S. medical student, Salvador Allende Hospital, Havana.
Photo by Sarah van Gelder

U.S. Students in Cuba
Recently, Cuba extended the offer of free medical training to students from the United States. It started when Representative Bennie Thompson of Mississippi got curious after he and other members of the Congressional Black Caucus repeatedly encountered Cuban or Cuban-trained doctors in poor communities around the world.

They visited Cuba in May 2000, and during a conversation with Fidel Castro, Thompson brought up the lack of medical access for his poor, rural constituents. “He [Castro] was very familiar with the unemployment rates, health conditions, and infant mortality rates in my district, and that surprised me,” Thompson said. Castro offered scholarships for low-income Americans under the same terms as the other international students—they have to agree to go back and serve their communities.

Today, about 90 young people from poor parts of the United States have joined the ranks of international students studying medicine in Cuba.

The offer of medical training is just one way Cuba has reached out to the United States. Immediately after Hurricanes Katrina and Rita, 1,500 Cuban doctors volunteered to come to the Gulf Coast. They waited with packed bags and medical supplies, and a ship ready to provide backup support. Permission from the U.S. government never arrived.

“Our government played politics with the lives of people when they needed help the most,” said Representative Thompson. “And that's unfortunate.”

When an earthquake struck Pakistan shortly afterwards, though, that country's government warmly welcomed the Cuban medical professionals. And 2,300 came, bringing 32 field hospitals to remote, frigid regions of the Himalayas. There, they set broken bones, treated ailments, and performed operations for a total of 1.7 million patients.

The disaster assistance is part of Cuba's medical aid mission that has extended from Peru to Indonesia, and even included caring for 17,000 children sickened by the 1986 accident at the Chernobyl nuclear plant in the Ukraine.

It isn't only in times of disaster that Cuban health care workers get involved. Some 29,000 Cuban health professionals are now practicing in 69 countries—mostly in Latin America, the Caribbean, and Africa. In Venezuela, about 20,000 of them have enabled President Hugo Chávez to make good on his promise to provide health care to the poor. In the shantytowns around Caracas and the banks of the Amazon, those who organize themselves and find a place for a doctor to practice and live can request a Cuban doctor.

As in Cuba, these doctors and nurses live where they serve, and become part of the community. They are available for emergencies, and they introduce preventative health practices.

Some are tempted to use their time abroad as an opportunity to leave Cuba. In August, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security announced a new policy that makes it easier for Cuban medical professionals to come to the U.S. But the vast majority remain on the job and eventually return to Cuba.

Investing in Peace
How do the Cuban people feel about using their country's resources for international medical missions? Those I asked responded with some version of this: We Cubans have big hearts. We are proud that we can share what we have with the world's poor.

Nearly everyone in Cuba knows someone who has served on a medical mission. These doctors encounter maladies that have been eradicated from Cuba. They expand their understanding of medicine and of the suffering associated with poverty and powerlessness, and they bring home the pride that goes with making a difference.

And pride is a potent antidote to the dissatisfaction that can result from the economic hardships that continue 50 years into Cuba's revolution.

From the government's perspective, their investment in medical internationalism is covered, in part, by ALBA, the new trade agreement among Venezuela, Bolivia, Nicaragua and Cuba. ALBA, an alternative to the Free Trade Area of the Americas, puts human needs ahead of economic growth, so it isn't surprising that Cuba's health care offerings fall within the agreement, as does Venezuelan oil, Bolivian natural gas, and so on. But Cuba also offers help to countries outside of ALBA.

“All we ask for in return is solidarity,” Dr. Ceballos says.

“Solidarity” has real-world implications. Before Cuba sent doctors to Pakistan, relations between the two countries were not great, Ceballos says. But now the relationship is “magnificent.” The same is true of Guatemala and El Salvador. “Although they are conservative governments, they have become more flexible in their relationship with Cuba,” he says.

Those investments in health care missions “are resources that prevent confrontation with other nations,” Ceballos explains. “The solidarity with Cuba has restrained aggressions of all kinds.” And in a statement that acknowledges Cuba's vulnerabilities on the global stage, Ceballos puts it this way: “It's infinitely better to invest in peace than to invest in war.”

Imagine, then, that this idea took hold. Even more revolutionary than the right to health care for all is the idea that an investment in health—or in clean water, adequate food or housing—could be more powerful, more effective at building security than bombers and aircraft carriers.



Sarah van Gelder, executive editor of YES!, was in Cuba (legally) in December 2006 visiting medical schools, clinics, and hospitals. Her travel was supported by The Atlantic Philanthropies, and MEDICC provided program consulting..

In Their Own Words

YES! Photo-essay: meet the Cuban doctors who provide disaster relief abroad.

¡Salud! Cuba's Global Health Mission



The film ¡Salud! follows Cuban doctors to Honduras, Venezuela, the Gambia, and other poor countries where they offer medical care and training. The 90-minute documentary also tells of the thousands of international medical students studying in Cuba, and what it means to their communities when they return. Read about ¡Salud! here or visit: www.saludthefilm.net

MEDICC (Medical Education Cooperation with Cuba), distributes ¡Salud! and supports international medical students and graduates trained in Cuba who are returning to under-served areas to practice medicine. MEDICC publishes MEDICC Review, a peer-reviewed journal on Cuban medical and public health, and Cuba Health Reports, an online news service, and assists U.S. health professionals exploring the Cuban public health experience. www.medicc.org

Just how well does the Cuban health system measure up? We took a look at some key indicators from the UN and WHO to compare Cuban and U.S. health care.

 
A vaccine with proven effectiveness against Meningitis B was developed in Cuba in the 1980s. Since then, 55 million doses have been administered in Cuba and other countries. But not in the U.S., where outbreaks still kill children. Dr. Robert Fortner, MD, wanted to find out why. His findings are at: www.yesmagazine.org/vaccine

Acknowledgements:  Sarah van Gelder

www.yesmagazine.org/issues/latin-america-rising/cuba's cure













Enhanced by Zemanta

Monday, December 20, 2010

Information, disinformation and changing the rules...

Information, disinformation and changing the rules

WikiLeaks
The controversial leader of WikiLeaks, Julian Assange.
Leon Neal/AFP Photo/Getty Images
At first glance, ‘Cablegate’ – the mass leaking of US embassy cables to five of the world’s newspapers, including the Guardian here in the UK – might seem a bit of a disappointment to the conspiracy theorist, laying bare the unsurprising duplicity (and bitchiness, one might add) of diplomacy but revealing nothing of grand-scale world-domination plots or evil puppet-masters behind the operations of international diplomacy. The US government's heavy-handed response, however, has provided plenty of grist to the conspiracy mill, while the escalating war between secrecy and transparency must have implications for conspiracy theory’s future.

So far, Julian Assange and WikiLeaks have been broadly supported by conspiracy theorists – support that the arrest of Assange and apparent pressure on WikiLeaks from the US government is likely to encourage. WikiLeaks has been applauded on conspiracy forums as a paragon of disclosure and a shining example to the cowardly US media: as one poster on rense.com put it: “The American media is a whore, whereas the courageous blood of warriors runs through WikiLeaks’ veins.”

But WikiLeaks is not above suspicion. There were stirrings after the release of the Afghan war logs, which, posters suggested, was a disinformation campaign meant to hide the involvement of the US and UK in drug smuggling; or else it was a covert attack on Pakistan to please India and Israel. Now with the release of the embassy cables, it is Israel that is again drawing the attention of suspicious minds. It's a Mossad plot, runs the argument, to make Iran look like the bad guy, so advancing the clash of civilisations scenario. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad himself blames the US for the release of the cables, claiming it’s all a ploy to undermine him. The idea is gaining credence on conspiracy forums. Users point to the cables’ pro-American tone (apparently oblivious to the fact that they were written by American diplomats), and speculate that the 'leak' is in fact a false flag operation à la 9/11, a pretext either for bringing forward an imminent war on Islam or curtailing freedom of speech. In a neat think-twist beloved by conspiracy theorists everywhere, further evidence for this comes from the fact that the leak was allowed to happen: Washington is too clever and powerful to have been outwitted by WikiLeaks; the very fact of disclosure proves that disclosure to be false. [1] Out on the wilder fringes of conspiracydom, more exotic theories speculate that the Russians, George Soros, demons or aliens are really behind the whole affair.

But while many conspiracy theorists might support Assange, he has made clear his contempt for them, saying “Many weirdos email us about UFOs or how they discovered that they were the antichrist while talking with their ex-wife at a garden party over a pot-plant.” And this despite Assange sharing similar character traits (paranoia, self-righteousness, a conviction of his own unique intelligence, individual-against-the-system rhetoric) [2] and having as an ultimate goal the dissolution of all conspiracies.

This one-time hacker isn’t simply a freedom of information activist, though: He wants to reorganise society and speaks of “radically shifting regime behaviour”. And while identifying his primary targets as oppressive regimes such as those in China and Russia, he has also said that exposing secrets could “bring down many administrations that rely on concealing reality – including the US administration”. Many commentators have argued that the material Assange has chosen to leak reveals, in fact, an openly anti-US agenda.

Where Assange differs from many other conspiracy theorists is in seeing the operation of the state – any state – as, by definition, a conspiracy: states, along with big business, constitute conspiratorial institutional hierarchies, or “patronage networks”. Laying out his philosophy in two 2006 tracts, “Conspiracy as Governance” and “State and Terrorist Conspiracies”, Assange wrote: “Authoritarian regimes give rise to forces which oppose them by pushing against the individual and collective will to freedom, truth and self realization. Plans which assist authoritarian rule, once discovered, induce resistance. Hence these plans are concealed by successful authoritarian powers. This is enough to define their behaviour as conspiratorial.” He explains such conspiracies as being predicated on the communication links between members; disrupt these links, he says, and you will induce fear and paranoia, forcing the organisation to turn in on itself, making communication less effective – meaning it is less able to think or conspire and thus hold on to power. “If total conspiratorial power is zero, there is no information flow between the conspirators and hence no conspiracy.” Secretive and unjust organisations are to be made more secretive and unjust in order that they might implode: “When we look at an authoritarian conspiracy as a whole, we see a system of interacting organs, a beast with arteries and veins whose blood may be thickened and slowed until it falls, stupefied; unable to sufficiently comprehend and control the forces in its environment.”

Like many anarchists, Assange has been less forthcoming about exactly what would replace the current system. His idea seems to be of a collection of individuals, each free to experience emotions and enjoy full self-actualisation. [3] Ironically, it would seem that this most tech-savvy and plugged-in of men would like this to happen in a Rousseauesque rural idyll. As he wrote on his personal website, iq.org: “I’d take a deep book, a backpack of food and a tent and go walking for three months along the .au or .nzdecalibrate by disconnecting behaviour and reward and failing to provide the sense data that our biological mental and physical structures have evolved to require.”

The contradictions of Assange’s position have not gone unremarked. His own organisation is highly secretive and depends on encrypted channels of communication between individuals. The lack of transparency of WikiLeaks’ own funding has also raised eyebrows, not least those of John Young, who set up document-leaking site Cryptome in 1996 and helped found WikiLeaks before leaving over concerns about its hubris, size, and the money if was seeking to raise (he is still broadly supportive of the site, despite remarks comparing it to a cult, government or spy organisation which were interpreted by the more conspiracy-minded as clear proof of WikiLeaks being a CIA-front).

WikiLeaks, one might argue, enjoys just the kind of power without accountability of which Assange is so critical. His attempts to cut the communication links of his enemies could themselves be seen as a form of censorship. Assange has argued that the ends justify the means – that he and WikiLeaks members might get “blood on our hands” from publishing, for example, a document about electromagnetic devices used by soldiers to prevent IEDs from being triggered, but that the ultimate goal makes that a price worth paying. To some, this makes him as morally compromised as those he’d like to expose, and his own authoritarian style, control freakery and grandstanding seem out of line with his ideological pronouncements and the ethos of the hacker community from which he emerged.

Still, while not everyone agrees with his personal style and subversive ambitions, he has certainly fired up the freedom of information debate. As we go to press, it seems no one is quite sure whether, legally speaking, the leaking of secrets in this manner is wrong. Assange himself, of course, is in no doubt. In 2008, after lawyers demanded that WikiLeaks take down the Scientology manuals it had posted online, Assange retorted: "WikiLeaks will not comply with legally abusive requests from Scientology any more than WikiLeaks has complied with similar demands from Swiss banks, Russian offshore stem-cell centers, former African kleptocrats, or the Pentagon."

As the Justice Department desperately tries to put together a case against Assange, an infowar is raging in cyberspace. Whether under the direct control of Washington or not (there is, after all, the First Amendement to consider), forces are conspiring to take WikiLeaks down. Amazon, which hosted its servers in the US, withdrew services on the grounds that the site was breaking its terms and conditions, as did domain name firm EveryDNS; Visa, Mastcard and PayPal (who claimed to have acted under US government pressure, then retracted the statement) suspended all payments to the site. All of these companies subsequently suffered revenge attacks by hackers, in a series of DDoS (distributed denial-of-service) attacks orchestrated by the collective Anonymous under the moniker 'Operation: Payback'. Declaring “the major shitstorm has begun”, Anonymous (which describes itself as "an anonymous, decentralised movement that fights against censorship and copywrong") is also attacking the sites of other assorted WikiLeaks ‘enemies’, including Joe Lieberman and Sarah Palin, and it threatened Twitter after suggestions, which Twitter denies, that #wikileaks was being prevented from trending. WikiLeaks has itself been bombarded with DDoS attacks, apparently by hackers favourable to the cause of the US government. WikiLeaks will be incredibly hard, however, to take down permanently, largely because of the complexity of its infrastructure. It has its content on many servers and hundreds of domain names; it is woven through the Internet, and where it has physical locations these are spread between different countries and frequently have to be traced back through third parties. There are also now hundreds of mirror sites, and an encrypted file released by WikiLeaks and containing all the embassy cables is now being furiously copied and shared via peer-to-peer networks like BitTorrent.

Even if Assange were to be silenced or WikiLeaks shut down, the genie is out of the bottle. Other document hosting sites – Cryptome, IndoLeaks, BalkanLeaks – already exist, and more will spring up to take WikiLeaks’s place. More widely, the ranks of those fighting for transparency are swelling: for instance, Peter Sunde (one of the founders of The Pirate Bay), is attempting to create a new root server to compete with ICANN, the system which controls the internet's domain name system and can take down domains considered to be breaking the law; Iceland has passed the Icelandic Modern Media Initiative (IMMI), which seeks to create a legal safe haven for journalists by combining all the source-protection, freedom of information and transparency laws from around the world.

This is a war about secrecy in an Internet age: is secrecy desirable, and if so, is it possible? Who wins the war is of great moment to the conspiracy theorist. If the forces for concealment triumph, increasingly lurid conspiracies will flourish, even if hounded to the edges of the net. But Assange’s focus is not on what is revealed so much as on the process of revealing; and if the movement for transparency comes out on top, the traditional conspiracy theorist may have to choose between joining in the practical fight for disclosure or clinging to pet theories in the face of mounting lack of evidence and becoming an irrelevance.

In that case, the Internet, commonly held to have been a boon to conspiracy theory, could become, in some senses, the agent of its collapse. The other possibility is that a growing avalanche of leaks eventually exposes the existence of some nefarious New World Order scheme to take over the world, proving the conspiracy theorists to have been right all along…



Notes
1 This, for example, from gem_man on abovetopsecret, is typical of posts in this vein: "I'm also starting to think that Wikileaks is a disinfo agent of the US government. Disseminate some truth and sprinkle them with lies. The US government can easily embargo the Wikileaks website but they don't do it. The other purpose of Wikileaks is to give the US government some public support in suppressing the information flowing in the internet. They can always say that they have to regulate the internet because the internet is a threat to national security."
2  "When my eyes see phrases like 'right thing to do', 'appropriate' etc, I wonder what unstated world view I am meant to share. These phrases smell of that unusually putrid whip; social sanction. But every man has experienced social sanction as the direct manifestation of morons baying at the moon, nodding and calling the result consensus.”
3  From iq.org: "Do not be concerned about when one is to do good, who defines good, etc. Act in the way you do because to do otherwise would [to be] at odds with yourself. Being on a path true to your character carries with it a state of flow, where the thoughts about your next step come upon waking, unbidden, but welcome."



Sources
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-11928899
rense.com
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/08/world/08leak.html?partner=rss&emc=rss
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2010/dec/08/paypal-us-pressure-wikileaks-mastercard
http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2010/06/07/100607fa_fact_khatchadourian?current
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/blog/2010/dec/03/julian-assange-wikileaks

http://iq.org/conspiracies.pdf

http://web.archive.org/web/20070110200827/
http://iq.org/conspiracies.pdf
http://zunguzungu.wordpress.com/2010/11/29/julian-assange-and-the-computer-conspiracy-%E2%80%9Cto-destroy-this-invisible-government%E2%80%9D/
abovetopsecret.com
http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2010/12/columbia-wikileaks-policy/
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn19816-info-pirates-seek-an-alternative-internet.html

http://catastrophist.wordpress.com/2010/08/14/john-young-internet-vast-spying-machine/

http://catastrophist.wordpress.com/2010/07/29/wikileaks-internal-dissent/
http://www.techeye.net/internet/wau-holland-foundation-sheds-light-on-wikileaks-donations
http://news.cnet.com/8301-31921_3-20011106-281.html

http://blather.net/zeitgeist/archives/2010/04/cryptome_definitively_supports.html

http://blogs.forbes.com/andygreenberg/2010/11/29/wikileaks-julian-assange-wants-to-spill-your-corporate-secrets/
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread634966/pg1
http://web.archive.org/web/20071020051936/
http://iq.org/
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/crime/news/article.cfm?c_id=30&objectid=10692956

http://www.aolnews.com/2010/12/16/weird-offbeat-and-funny-news-pictures-photos/




Enhanced by Zemanta

Thursday, December 2, 2010

The World Aids Day is celebrated on 1 December each year...

The World Aids day is celebrated on 1st December every year. It is dedicated to elevate the awareness of AIDS pandemic sources by spreading of HIV infectivity. It is ordinary to hold remembrance to respect persons who have expired from HIV/AIDS on this day. Health officials and Govt detect the event, often with forums or speeches on AIDS theme. Since 1995, the President of United States has created an official announcement on the World AIDS Day. Govt of other states have made similar announcement on this day.

This disease has killed above 25 million people between 1981 and 2007. About 33.2 million people universal live with HIV/AIDS as of 2007. It has become the most critical epidemic in the recorded history.

Read more::http://www.altiusdirectory.com/society/world-aids-day.php
Enhanced by Zemanta

Saturday, October 16, 2010

The destruction of Atlantis and Europe

Detail of The School of Athens by Raffaello Sa...Image via Wikipedia
 


THE DESTRUCTION OF ATLANTIS AND EUROPE:


According to Plato, the legendary continent of Atlantis was situated west of the Pillars of Hercules(Straight of Gibralter) in what is now the mid-Atlantic ocean. Atlantis was to the world then in many ways what America is to the world today -a superpower with advanced technology. Some twelve to thirteen thousand years ago, a pole shift shook the Earth ripping its way through Atlantis where it became the planet's new south polar opening. Atlantis was now no longer a tropical paradise but became a frozen polar land mass which we know today as the Antarctic. Recent secret expeditions by both American and Russian scientists have detected underground lakes and signs of civilization two miles beneath the antarctic ice. Our planet practices a kind of crop rotation tecnique with its landmasses every six to twelve thousand years so that what was once ice, desert, or sea becomes land and vice-versa. The next shift-accompanied rotation may well occur within the next twenty-five years, and this time the magnetic north or "path of the Lord" is supposed to rip its way through Europe where it will become the new north polar opening. This abyss or opening will be some 1400 to 1600 miles across. Along the path of destruction and through the newly formed polar opening will shine the light of the Lord(inner sun) which every eye shall see. Both Hitler and Edgar Cayce foresaw the destruction or sinking of much of Europe, as did Nostradamus and others.
Read about other prophecies and conspiracies:


http://www.librarising.com/conspiracy/prophecy.html

Tuesday, August 17, 2010

Muslim spiritual leaders change their mind about proposed project at Ground Zero site...

World Trade Center aerial view March 2001Image via Wikipedia


BREAKING NEWS

08:54

Soldier with Facebook pictures with bound Palestinians defends pictures (Army Radio)08:37 Central Baghdad suicide bombing kills at least 7 people, wounds 21 (Reuters)

08:16 Police: We still cannot say if document in Galant affair is forged or not (Army Radio)

07:37 IDF arrests eight wanted Palestinians overnight in the West Bank (Ch.10)

07:10 Prime Minister Netanyahu to meet senior Greek officials in Athens (Army Radio)

05:49 Man sentenced in New York to 2.5 years in jail for violating Iran trade embargo (AP)

04:51 Suspected al-Qaida militants kill Yemen intelligence officer (Reuters)

04:01 U.S. Senate majority leader Harry Reid opposes Ground Zero mosque (Reuters)

03:43 Study: New dads secrete hormones that strengthens bond with infants (Haaretz)

03:22 Ground Zero mosque backers vow to press ahead with their plans (Reuters)

02:35 U.S. plans to open diplomatic offices in four more Iraqi cities (Reuters)

01:57 Rightist group threatens boycott of Ben Gurion University over 'anti-Zionist' bias (Haaretz)

01:23 Court grants compensation to residents near Ben Gurion Airport for noise (Haaretz)

00:43 Report: Women's flotilla to depart Lebanon for Gaza this week (Army Radio)

00:37

40-year-old man moderately hurt in hit-and-run accident near Ashkelon (Ch. 10)More Breaking News > HomeNewsInternationalPublished 20:32 16.08.10

Latest update 20:32 16.08.10

Muslim leaders to abandon plans for Ground Zero community center

Insiders say Muslim spiritual leaders behind the controversial initiative are considering giving up on the former World Trade Center location, in a gesture of appeasement.

By Shlomo Shamir

Tags: Israel news

After weeks of heated debate over plans for an Islamic community center near Ground Zero - the site of the 9/11 attacks on New York - it seems Muslim leaders will soon back down, agreeing to move to a new site.



The decision follows a high-profile campaign against the project that included advertisements on New York buses showing images of the burning Twin Towers, an iconic landmark razed when al-Qaida terrorists flew packed passenger planes into them in 2001. The New York Republican party is also said to be planning a hostile television campaign.





Sources in New York said on Monday that Muslim religious and business leaders will announce plans to abandon the project in the next few days.



New York Governor David Patterson said last weekend that Muslim leaders had rejected outright his proposal tto swap the site in for another in Manhattan.



But several people familiar with the debate among New York's Islamic activists now claim that the leaders are convinced abandoning the site is preferable to unleashing a wave of bitterness towards Muslims.



They also hope the move will be seen as a show of sensitivity to families of the victims of the 9/11 attacks, and to the American public generally.



Another factor in the apparent climbdown is a lack of funds to pay for construction of the center, estimated to cost a hundred million dollars. Backers hope moving it will lead to a wave of support, accompanied by cash donations.



It is also possible that the decision was also influenced by comments made by U.S. President Barack Obama on Sunday, in which he appeared to reverse an earlier show of support.



Obama said that when he went on record backing the center, he meant only that it was the right of every religious group to establish its own places of worship – but he did not intend to justify building the center specifically at Ground Zero.

http://haaretz.com/


Enhanced by Zemanta

Monday, March 22, 2010

Is the Healthcare legislation actually constitutional...

WASHINGTON - MARCH 03:  US President Barack Ob...Image by Getty Images via Daylife

Is health-care reform constitutional?





















With the House set to vote on health-care legislation, the congressional debate on the issue seems to be nearing its conclusion. But if the bill does become law, the battle over federal control of health care will inevitably shift to the courts. Virginia's attorney general, Ken Cuccinelli II, has said he will file a legal challenge to the bill, arguing in a column this month that reform legislation "violate[s] the plain text of both the Ninth and Tenth Amendments." On Friday, South Carolina Attorney General Henry McMaster and Florida Attorney General Bill McCollum announced that they will file a federal lawsuit if health-care reform legislation passes.

Acknowledgements: Washington Post


Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Tuesday, March 2, 2010

The KKK vs Students and the Trail of Dreams...

* Description: A Ku Klux Klan meeting in Gaine...Image via Wikipedia

The KKK vs. Students and the trail of dreams...

Early this year, four students embarked on a 1,500 mile march from Miami to Washington, D.C called the "Trail of Dreams" tour.

Their goal? To raise awareness about our failed immigration policies.

Their challenge? To do so while avoiding deportation and the wrath of anti-immigrant groups like the KKK.

These students are among the tens of thousands of those who graduate from high school in America each year but are prevented from applying for federal student aid for college or a job because of something entirely out of their control: they are undocumented.

Like many undocumented students, the Trails of Dreams marchers were each brought to the United States while young and have grown up like any other American - volunteering in their community, reaching the honor roll, and applying to top universities.

But our current immigration policies penalize them for decisions made by their parents long ago and prevent them from fully contributing back to the country they love. As one of many examples, one of the Trail of Dreams marchers, Felipe, was accepted to Duke University but had to pass up his dream of attending due to the lack of a Social Security number.

As they walk up the East Coast, the Trail of Dreams marchers are engaging communities in dialogue about the negative impact of our current immigration system. But they are not without opposition, and this past week as they entered Georgia they were greeted by an unwelcome counter-demonstration by a racist blast from the past: the Ku Klux Klan.

The KKK demonstrators accused the students of being part of a "Latino invasion," arguing that "God put each race in their respective continent and they were meant to stay there."

The student marchers' response? They didn't spew back hate, or point fingers, or threaten violence. Instead, they were joined by members of the NAACP and sang songs of freedom and justice.

The contrast between those fighting for tolerance and human rights and those filled with hate and fighting for discrimination couldn't have been starker. And it couldn't have been clearer which group is marching on the side of history.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Change Weekly

Friday, February 12, 2010

Australian and Canadian Police versus American police...


Australian and Canadian Police versus American Police:

How can you tell the difference between Canadian, Australian, and American Police?

Pose the following question:

“You’re walking down a deserted street with your wife and two small children. Suddenly, a dangerous looking man with a huge knife comes around the corner, locks eyes with you, screams obscenities, raises the knife, and charges. You are carrying a Glock 40, and you are an expert shot. You have mere seconds before he reaches you and your family.”

What do you do?

CANADIAN POLICE CONSTABLES
Answer: (Immediate thought processes)

•Is the knife a ceremonial kirpan?
•Does he prefer to communicate in English or French?
•Will this negatively impact my chances of promotion?
•Is this just his way of telling me that he pays my wages, and wants my
job?
•Would this be an appropriate time to hug him and sing Koombaya?
•Will the media do a profile of him and how he was loved by everyone
including his dog?
•Is the alleged ‘client’ a member of the NDP or an Environmental Group?
•Is he just a squeegee kid / pan handler trying to make a living on the
mean streets?
•Is he a member of a gang that is just ‘misunderstood’ by society?
•Is he an undercover Toronto Star reporter looking for a news breaker?
•Is he a recent illegal immigrant to this country, and just doesn’t know
how to approach the police?
•Is he recently released on parole and hasn’t been properly integrated back
into the community?
•Is he a victim of fetal alcohol syndrome, and just doesn’t understand what
he is doing?
•Warn and Charter him as he approaches.
AUSTRALIAN POLICE CONSTABLES

Answer: BANG!

AMERICAN POLICE OFFICERS

Answer: BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG!
BANG! BANG! Click…. (Sounds of reloading) BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG!
BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! Click Click Click

Acknowledgements: Australian blogs


Reblog this post [with Zemanta]